Gerald Ford: Natural death or foul play?

I haven’t formulated a cohesive theory about this yet, but am I the only one who thinks it’s a little bit convenient that the patriarch of the Republican party just happened to die less than two years before the next presidential election?

Without Gerald Fords experience and leadership, the democrats gain a slight tactical advantage during the next election.

I’m not saying either way, but if I were a liberal I wouldn’t exactly be mourning the passing of this man. In fact, if I were a liberal, I probably would have already thought of several ways I could have expedited this event—perhaps someone did more than just THINK?

Comments (3) to “Gerald Ford: Natural death or foul play?”

  1. I’m with you on Gerald Ford. It was muuuuuuurderrrrrr.

  2. Yes, as much as I hate to admit it, I see no other reasonable explanation for this treasonous act. Now it’s just a matter of determining if it was a liberal assassin, or an act of global terrorism.

  3. Gerald Ford was the last Freemason to be President. This is most likely a cover up!

Post a Comment
*Required
*Required (Never published)