Joey Buttafuoco has been through a lot—most would agree, too much.

This brave man has been forced to start his life over more times than I can count, but he never gives up. That’s the American spirit—never give up hope. Recently he was imprisoned after the government raided his home and found “illegal” ammunition. I guess this man is not allowed the same civil liberties as the rest of America—a man whose life has been turned upside down by violent crime is not allowed to protect his own home?

Well, he’s out of jail and starting over again. I just hope this time society can just let him be. He’s suffered enough.

The government can say what they want about him, but in my book he’s a stand-up guy. He stayed with his wife for years, despite her grotesque disfigurement. That has to count for something.

At Yale, America’s best and brightest have decided that the best and brightest way to thwart gun violence is to stop allowing their theater students from using the “dangerous” realistic-looking swords in their drama productions. I suspect this change has been in the works for awhile and the recent campus violence in the news was just the excuse they needed to make the homosexuals in the drama department feel less threatened by all the realistic looking weapons.

Enjoy your stupid wooden swords, sissies. I pray your campus is never invaded by anyone with an expertise in edged weapons!

I typically don’t watch a lot of television during the day, especially in the morning. I like to wake up early and get to work in my laboratory. Sometimes though, if I’ve had an accident during the night, I’ll linger in bed until the rest of my family leaves the house. On days like that I’ll sometimes find myself watching shows like Regis and Kelly, or The View.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a proponent of women in the workforce at all, and when it comes to the media I feel it’s especially inappropriate and irresponsible to show women who work as role models. My frustrations with the state of television were compounded when ABC decided it would be a good move to add an angry lesbian to their morning chicken coop by replacing previously obese, Star Jones, with the perpetually obese, Rosie O’donell. I’ve endured Rosie several mornings a week for what seems like an eternity, so it was welcome news when I read that she will be leaving in June.

I’m not one to withhold credit where it’s due. Despite my aversion to the glorification of homosexuality, I do applaud Ms. O’donell’s bravery in exposing certain truths to the American public, topics like the 9/11 conspiracy are far too often avoided by mainstream media. But overall, I am pleased to see that she will be moving on to graze on greener carpets.

After 25 years in prison, Jerry Miller was exonerated of rape charges on Monday based only on DNA evidence.

They say that prison is like a school for criminals. Knowing this, should we still allow people who have been incarcerated for long periods of time leave prison? The answer is an unequivocal, NO! Even if technically they are innocent of the crime they were originally imprisoned for, it is likely that they’ll be leaving prison with a chip on their shoulder and a new knowledge of criminal endeavors. For this reason we should either stop DNA testing on old cases, or ignore the outcome of such tests.

As a practicing Jedi I spend a lot of time explaining what it is that I believe and how the Star Wars saga fits in with Jediism—especially when I go out wearing my full Jedi tunic. This may sound like it would get tiresome after awhile, but I feel as though I am a Jedi missionary in many ways. I am given the opportunity to evangelize and I know that a percentage of the people I talk to will get the message and will possibly be compelled to find out more about Jediism—or possibly pay me a small fee to take their photo with me in my Jedi regalia. Short of that, they may eventually be in a position to defend the name of the Jedi and call upon some of the wisdom I am able to bestow upon them during our short exchange. Ideally if enough people become familiarized with the Jedi and their beliefs, the Jedi movement will become accepted in the mainstream—and, God willing, tax exempt like Scientology.

One of the differences between my personal beliefs in The Force, and the beliefs of many other Jediism followers, is that mine are deeply woven in with the “fictional” Star Wars universe. Many other Jedi only draw superficial parallels between reality and George Lucas’ vision of Star Wars. I believe that George Lucas was either privy to some information about the ways of the universe that we are not, or at the very least was divinely inspired. I can’t simply believe that a work of “fiction” so flawlessly executed as the Star Wars epics was a simple exercise in creativity.

There are many similarities in my life to the life of Luke Skywalker. From my upbringing in a repressed society, to my uncanny skills in battle, to my wife—who I believe I may be related to much as Luke was related to Leia (I’ve begun researching our genealogy and the more I discover, the more it looks like my wife and I are closely related). As you no doubt know by now, I believe that everything happens for a reason. I can name many things throughout my life have brought me closer to the Jedi path, and many other things have reinforced my decision since becoming a Jedi.

I keep my eyes open to parallels that can be drawn between the realities we know to be real, and the realities of the Star Wars universe. Recently, I’ve been researching the many “coincidences” between the early scenes in Star Wars on the planet Tatooine and the location surrounding Noah’s Ark atop Mt. Ararat.

Though by no means the total sum of my research, I’ve taken a moment and thrown together an image for you to see a few points of similarity between the two locations. You can clearly see from the satellite photo taken by Keyhole-9 in 1973 that there are not only some interesting geographical similarities between the locations, but there are also MANY other specific items of interest that match George Lucas’ product exactly.

In the image below you can see not only the Valley where Luke encountered the savage Tuscan Raiders, but also the location of Old Ben’s home (#4). The crater where R2D2 and C3P0 landed their escape pod is visible as well (#3). Directly to the left of the craters, you will find what could either be the tracks of a Sand Crawler (possibly the same one that picked up R2 & 3P0 in the desert), or the spine of the Drayt Dragon (#2). Obviously the item at the peak of the mountain (#1) is what we all know to be the final resting place of Noah’s Ark.

Star Wars fans will no doubt quickly see the Sarlacc pit, The Mos Eisley Space Port, and even the small ranch dwelling that the Skywalker’s called home.

I could accept that some of these items are coincidences, but to take a look at a single unedited satellite photo and easily find this many recognizable landmarks seems like too much to simply be chance.

Hopefully we’ll be able to make some sense of this terrible event. Here is some incite from leaders in our community that can hopefully help put us on the right track to getting the answers we all need:

Dr. Richard Roberts, president of Oral Roberts University:

“Based on what I’ve seen in the news,” Roberts said in an interview, “there’s no doubt that this act was Satanic in origin.”

Roberts added that he doesn’t know if it was Satanic “possession” or “oppression.” Possession, he said, occurs when Satan takes over a person’s life, and the person’s actions are dictated by demonic possession within. Roberts says he’s seen this type and has seen the Devil cast out of a person.

Satanic “oppression,” on the other hand, is “that which comes against.” “It’s not in a person, but is coming against them, trying to put evil thoughts in their minds,” Roberts said.

He said that the evil thoughts in Satanic oppression can be fairly innocuous, or they can be harmful. And the oppression can be in the form of fear, depression or discouragement, he said, because “Satan comes to kill, steal and destroy.”

Roberts says we’ll never know whether Cho was “possessed” or “oppressed,” because the killer has died.

Mark Steyn, National Review columnist, author of America Alone:

“The students at Virginia Tech were grown women and — if you’ll forgive the expression — men…
…It is a poor reflection on us that, in those first critical seconds where one has to make a decision, only an elderly Holocaust survivor, Professor Librescu, understood instinctively the obligation to act.”

Ken Ham, President, AiG-US:

…it’s not God’s fault that there is death and violence in the world—it’s humanity’s fault, because we rebelled against our Creator. Certainly, the shooter at Virginia Tech has to answer for his own sin. However, we still have to recognize that we now live in a fallen world where we have just a taste of what we really asked for in Adam, when the head of the human race disobeyed God’s instruction not to eat the fruit of one particular tree. In a real sense, we are all responsible for the death and suffering we see around us.

Sherwood Ross, columnist:

The American people, including the families of the murdered Virginia Tech innocents, have collective blood-guilt on their hands. I have not gone to jail to protest the war machine, so I am no better than they and probably a good deal worse because I have given the issue some thought. How many of those parents in the audience hearing the President’s words had elected to Congress men and women who voted for lax laws on gun ownership? How many of those parents in the audience had also voted for legislators who backed the president’s illegal invasion of Iraq?

Rush Limbaugh:

This guy, this shooter, he railed against everybody. He railed against women. He railed against Jesus. He railed against all kinds of things — also the rich. Guess what they focus on? Now, why does this guy hate the rich? He’s somehow found a way to go to four years at Virginia Tech. He’s been in the United States for 14 years. Who is it that made this guy hate the rich? Why, there’s only one answer to this! The Democrat Party, the American left and their willing accomplices in the Drive-By Media, routinely portray the rich as a bunch of evil, rotten SOBs who are out to steal everybody else’s money.

Many states are introducing laws that will make it easier for a doctor to admit guilt without legally implicating himself to the very misdeed he’s apologizing for.

Why is this significant? Previously the only recourse patients had against doctors who admitted that they’d intentionally caused you harm was to sue them and not refer their friends to them. These new laws will make it much more difficult to sue your doctor.

Imagine if you went to have a tumor removed and when you woke up from surgery your doctor said to you, “Sorry, I realized that if I take this tumor out you’d be cured and I won’t be able to charge your insurance company to treat you any longer. I decided to leave it in, I’m really sorry for the inconvenience.”

Now imagine that you died as a result of his greed.

Prior to this new legislation, the next call you would have made would be to your attorney. The first thing your attorney would have asked you would be, “Did he say he was sorry?” Now the first question your attorney will ask you is, “Why are you bothering me with this?” Even thought the doctor admitted to dooming you, there would be nothing that you could do about it.

Like the old saying goes: When they outlaw litigation, only outlaws will litigate.

I just noticed this article over at Dr. Kent Hovind’s site, written by John Hinton: Things that make evolutionists look stupid—Tailbones.

Most of Mr. Hinton’s commentary solidly exposes the logical discombobulation that Darwinians try to pass off on us as science. He poses difficult, but simple questions they can’t answer like, “Why don’t we still have tails when they’d be so useful?” and “Why does coccyxless Ashley Murry wear a diaper and regularly scat in her pants?”

Of course there’s no reasonable answer for either. But there’s more to the story. Yes, something that is missing from John’s argument is the sexual component of having a tail. I try to avoid discussing sex on this site, because I know it’s offensive. But on this important topic, I see no other option.

Please do not let your children read any further.

If the evolutionary rapscallions want us to believe that everything on our body happened for a reason AND that the quickest way to propagating a mutation is through a reproductive advantage—then there is no explanation for why these flexible appendages aren’t casting a shadow of decency over each of our buttockses right now!

Think of it this way: if I have a tail and my reproductive competitor does not…who do you think our eligible suitor will engage in intercourse with? Me, as usual. I have an extra appendage with which to satisfy my mate and therefore, by evolutionary definition, my seed will be planted and my tailless opponent will become extinct—or banished to the Galapagos.

For decades one of the best selling sexual aids has been a ring that’s worn by a man at the base of his genitals to prolong the sexual experience. I won’t tell you what it’s called, but a homonym for the term is Cock Ring…as in the playing field for a Rooster fight. Another item that has been a staple of any brothel for as long as I can remember is a device that I’ve taken to calling a Freedom Tickler (formerly French Tickler).

What do these perversions have to do with the length of your coccyx? Everything. Imagine how a monkey uses his tail to hang from a branch. You don’t need to let your mind wander too far to know how a tail could be used by prehistoric man during a romantic encounter to enhance his own performance. Should that technique fail, the cave dweller could relax on his back and let his built in Freedom Tickler wrap things up for him.

Besides the obvious performance advantages that a tail would afford our species, consider the convenience this appendage would offer in the form of restraint. The Peacock is forced to participate in an extravagant dance in order to lure his mate. Sometimes the female is impressed, sometimes it isn’t. What if the Peacock’s plume was hiding a monkey’s tail? The dance would switch from being a simple courtship ritual, to being a Trojan horse intended only to get the female within tail-striking distance.

The same benefits would be utilized by humans. If a man could deliver his tail with enough force to knock a female onto the ground, he could follow up with some type of restraining knot and then have his way. Should this fail, the tail could be used to fling semen at an escaping partner’s genitals, much in the same way primates are able to throw their feces at zoo patrons.

With this new information, I would encourage anyone to explain why modern man has no tail. Unfortunately for evolutionists, there is no rational explanation other than tails look stupid on people, and so the designer (God) made a decision that we shouldn’t have one.

Sometimes the easiest answer is the correct answer. It’s as simple as that.

I’m probably preaching to the choir here, but if you haven’t done so already, please add Chuck Norris to your daily reading regiment. Each of his entries over at WMD is greater than the next. Since I know some of the liberals who read my site are illiterate, here are some excerpts of his last posts to help you:

A power greater than my punch
I laughed the other day as I read another “Chuck Norris Fact” that someone sent me: “Nagasaki never had a bomb dropped on it. Chuck Norris jumped out of a plane and punched the ground.”

Bringing the Bible back into public schools
…I’m talking about the Bible in public school. It’s no joke!

From Hell’s Angel to Eternal Rider
…He eventually dropped out of school, hit the streets and never turned back. The law of the jungle was his only government.

It turns out the only real man in Hollywood is actually in Texas. Whether he’s spinning yarns of truth in his column or protecting Texas from criminals with his black sidekick in, Walker, Texas Ranger—Chuck knows how to get down to business.

That is a Chuck Norris fact you can take to the bank.

I’ve been accused of many things in my life, but not recognizing potential threats early is not one of them.

I’ll get right to it. I’m calling on everyone who reads this blog to boycott the iRobot Corporation by not purchasing any more of their products. If you own one of their products currently, I implore you to destroy it.

Anyone who is familiar with the lessons learned by the 12 Colonies of Kobol, will certainly recognize that any advances we make in technology solely for the purpose of making our own lives easier (especially with the help of robots) brings us one step closer to a technological singularity, and inevitably, one step closer to disaster.

I’ve watched for a few years as iRobot released numerous domestic robotic devices, each more advanced than the last. I’ve followed their progress in the industrial and government arenas as well. How long before these divisions merge into one? Not long I suspect.

Until now I’ve been confident that their efforts were no more sinister (intentionally, or otherwise) than any other developer of robotics. With the release of their newest product, the Verro, an advanced consumer device with underwater deployment capabilities, they have (unknowingly?) gone too far.

Though I’ve never published my plans for escaping the inevitable hostile robotic singularity event, I assumed the best chance we had to survive would be to move the entire remaining human population into underwater cities. Robots are largely composed of metal and would not survive long in that environment before rusting. Besides the likely corrosion and oxidization that would occur, many of their electronic components would not perform well underwater.

Unfortunately, iRobot has taken the first steps to making our last safe haven, not very safe at all. The new product gives consumers and competitors access to a relatively inexpensive test platform to develop new underwater robotic technology. It also creates a new category of robotics that will quickly be perverted and expanded if we don’t act now.

Please, take a moment and think about what is at stake here—pool cleaning seems safe, and other than a few drownings, it really has been. But it’s important to remember that cleaning pools is just the beginning. With their first underwater device, iRobot has taken away one of the few remaining exploitable weaknesses to robots that we had.

Please help spread the word.