Life in the panhandle state.
So, I’ve been up here in the pandhandle state, Idaho, for nearly several months now. I still have to drive back to to the epicenter of sin known as “Utah” nearly every week to meet with my parole officer or attend anger-management classes where I’m supposedly being taught how to repress my true feelings. (Mostly it’s just a class taught by a lesbian about how to use words instead of fists—I’m sure she knows how to use both quite well).
Overall I have been blessed. In six months when I can finally stop going back for the classes I will truly feel as though my life is perfect—except for some health problems and some issues I’ve been having with my daughters, one of whom is turning out to be a real slut.
My assessment of Idaho so far is this:
- The people are nice.
- There is a lot of diversity, which can be good or bad depending on what needs to get done.
- The women are cows, probably because it’s so cold here and they are trying to keep warm.
- It’s cold. I’ve been digging a tunnel under my property and the frozen ground is very difficult to get through.
- The food is good.
During these winter months I’m staying focused on fortifying my land with supplies and haven’t really had a chance to meet too many people. When I first got up here it was a little warmer and I did manage to make a few new acquaintances while I was evangelizing in town. It’s too cold for that now.
I can hardly wait for the weather to warm up so I can get back to my sasquatch research. If only Yeti were real and I didn’t have a weight problem, I’d strap on some snow shoes and start the hunt today!
Kiquer wrote:
“If only Yeti were real…”
To clarify:
Sasquatch and Yeti are completely different entities?
Posted on 18-Jan-08 at 10:39 pm | Permalink
speedball wrote:
Of course they are. Sasquatch is the great North American primate. Yeti is the fictitious “abominable snowman”
Posted on 21-Jan-08 at 12:25 am | Permalink
Kiquer wrote:
Thanks for the clarification.
So as primates, we are talking about breeding populations, baby sasquatch, regular family units and such?
Posted on 23-Jan-08 at 10:55 pm | Permalink
speedball wrote:
I can only assume that just as humans and Americans, baby sasquatch too stand a better chance of growing into productive members of sasquatch society when raised in a traditional family. It’s difficult to speculate, but based on my study of track groupings I would have to say, yes, it’s clear that the sasquatch tend to organize into traditional family units within breeding communities.
Posted on 24-Jan-08 at 1:02 am | Permalink
Kiquer wrote:
At first my response was going to be “Aha! Why don’t they ever find ‘little foot’ tracks,” but then I realized only the ‘Bigfoot’ tracks would garner attention.
Your mention of “track groupings” indicates you’ve personally found multiple sets of humanoid barefoot tracks in the forest. Why doesn’t anyone consider that strange?
No person I know walks around barefoot in the forest, let alone has their whole family traipse about unshod. What explanation does the scientific community offer?
Posted on 24-Jan-08 at 11:05 pm | Permalink
speedball wrote:
The scientific community is afraid of the facts. It’s rare that one of their representatives ever even returns my call. It’s a profession mired in tradition and mystery, sort of an old boys club that does not welcome outsiders or outside ideas.
Posted on 28-Jan-08 at 10:26 pm | Permalink
Kiquer wrote:
Amen brother!
Posted on 31-Jan-08 at 10:40 pm | Permalink